247
View
Open Access Peer-Reviewed|
ARTIGO DE REVISÃO

Contribution of computed tomography in the postmortem diagnosis of drowning: a systematic review

Contribuição da tomografia computadorizada no diagnóstico post-mortem de afogamento: uma revisão sistemática

Rachel Zeitoune1,a; Raquel Martins Loureiro1,b; Nívia Abadia Maciel de Melo Matias2,c; Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego Miziara1,d

DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0048
e20250048
Publish in: April 17 2026

ABSTRACT

The postmortem diagnosis of drowning is a challenge for forensic medicine. The objective of this review was to list the findings described in reports of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) examinations and autopsies of drowning victims, as well as to show how PMCT facilitates the diagnosis. The PubMed, Google Scholar, the Brazilian Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Office for the Advancement of Higher Education) Journals, and the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) databases were searched. The 17 studies included evaluated a collective total of 726 bodies of drowning victims and 477 bodies of people who died from other causes. Different PMCT protocols were used, some encompassing whole-body scans and others including scans only from the skull to the pelvis, with different slice thicknesses, all without the use of contrast. The finding most commonly described was fluid in the paranasal sinuses, mastoid air cells, and airways, referred to as specific for drowning if frothy, containing dense sediment, or both. A cutoff of 37.77 HU for the density of fluid in the paranasal sinuses was suggested to characterize drowning in salt water. Paltauf spots were detected only at autopsy. Although PMCT has proven to be a useful tool in making this diagnosis, it is too early to predict whether it can replace conventional autopsy. Current limitations include the absence of established protocols, a shortage of forensic radiologists, and low availability of CT scanners at forensic medicine facilities.

Keywords: Drowning; Postmortem imaging; Forensic imaging; Autopsy; Tomography, X-ray computed.

RESUMO

O diagnóstico post-mortem de afogamento é um desafio para a medicina legal. O objetivo desta revisão é elencar os achados descritos na tomografia computadorizada post-mortem (TCPM) e na autópsia de afogados e mostrar como a TCPM auxilia nesse diagnóstico. Foram pesquisadas as bases de dados PubMed, Google Acadêmico, Periódicos da Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior e International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Os 17 estudos incluídos avaliaram um total de 726 corpos vítimas de afogamento e 477 corpos mortos por outras causas. Foram realizados diferentes protocolos de TCPM, alguns abrangendo a varredura de todo corpo e outros apenas do crânio até a pelve, com espessuras de corte divergentes, todos sem uso de contraste. Os achados mais descritos foram: líquido nos seios paranasais, nas células das mastoides e nas vias aéreas, referidos como específicos para afogamento se espumoso e/ou associado a sedimento denso; sugerido um cut-off de 37,77 UH na densidade do líquido nos seios paranasais para caracterizar afogamento em água salgada. Apenas a autópsia evidenciou manchas de Paltauf. A TCPM mostrou-se uma ferramenta nesse diagnóstico, porém é cedo prever se poderá substituir a autópsia convencional. Dentre os limites atuais destacam-se a ausência de protocolos estabelecidos, escassez de radiologistas forenses e baixa disponibilidade de tomógrafos nos institutos médico-legais.

Palavras-chave: Afogamento; Imageamento post mortem; Imageamento forense; Autópsia; Tomografia computadorizada por raios X.

INTRODUCTION

Death by drowning is common worldwide. According to estimates from the World Health Organization, there are approximately 300,000 drowning deaths every year(1). Drowning disproportionately affects children and young people, representing the fourth leading cause of death in the 1-to-4-year age group and the third leading cause in the 5-to-14-year age group(1). It can occur in salt water (seas and oceans) and fresh water (rivers, lakes, wells, etc.).

Determining whether drowning was the cause of death for a body found in water is imperative in forensic investigations because a body submerged in water may signify secondary drowning (homicide) rather than primary (accidental) drowning. Making that diagnosis is often difficult because of the absence of definitive criteria in the autopsy, in which there can be nonspecific macroscopic findings common to other causes of death, such as the following(2-4): frothy fluid in the airways; fluid accumulation in the paranasal sinuses; pleural effusion; congested, hyperinflated lungs; hemorrhage in the middle ears; fluid in the stomach; and reduced spleen weight. The detection of diatoms in the bodies, through microscopic and DNA analysis, as well as the analysis of electrolytes in the pleural fluid, can be useful in diagnosing drowning and determining whether it occurred in salt water or fresh water. However, because of postmortem changes (transformative phenomena) and contamination, those signs are nonspecific(5). Therefore, when performed, an autopsy does not allow reliable differentiation between death by accidental drowning and a violent death with subsequent submersion of the body in water, as well as the type of water in which the drowning occurred.

With the evolution of technology, the advent of multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanners, the development of workstations capable of reconstructing three-dimensional images from the raw data acquired, and the greater availability of imaging methods in forensic medicine institutes, forensic radiology has gained importance and has come to play a larger role, as an adjunct to autopsy, in the practice of forensic medicine(6).

The objective of this review was to list the findings described in reports of PMCT examinations and autopsies of drowning victims, as well as to show how PMCT can facilitate the pathology-based diagnosis by conventional autopsy. Given that there have been few studies of postmortem imaging in drowning victims, this study has educational importance by providing an outline to forensic physicians and radiologists who are not familiar with forensic imaging.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria


This systematic literature review included studies that answered the research question according to the population–intervention–comparison–outcome strategy, namely, what is the contribution of CT scans in the postmortem diagnosis of drowning. Original articles available in Portuguese and English, published between 2000 and 2024, were selected, taking into account that prior to this period the quality and availability of CT scans were limited. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews were excluded, as were case series with only three or fewer cases and case reports. We also excluded studies involving the use of artificial intelligence, because they use a method based on deep learning, whose particularities make the comparison unequal and fall outside the scope of this review.

Article selection

The searches and article selection were conducted in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines, as shown in Figure 1. The searches were performed between August 2024 and January 2025 in four open-access databases—PubMed, Google Scholar, CAPES Journals, and PROSPERO—using the following expressions and Boolean connectors: "virtual autopsy" AND "drowning"; "post mortem computed tomography" AND "drowning"; and "computed tomography" AND "drowning" AND "autopsy".





The selected articles were organized in the Mendeley Library, and duplicate materials were then removed. Subsequently, a search for full-text articles was initiated; those for which the full text was not available in English or Portuguese were excluded. A search was also conducted for references cited in the articles (using the snowball technique).

Using the methods described above, we initially identified 2,467 articles. Of those, only 17 were included in the review.

Data collection and strategy for data synthesis

Two of the authors, working independently, reviewed the selected material, evaluating titles and abstracts, with disagreements being resolved by a third author. The full texts of the included studies were analyzed, and the data were transferred to tables standardized by the authors, with the following fields: authors; year of publication; country of origin; study design; population; time of autopsy and PMCT scan; sample characteristics of drowning versus non-drowning cases; CT scan specifications and examination protocol; autopsy findings, PMCT findings, and comparison between the two; results; and study limitations.


RESULTS

Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review


The 17 articles included in this review date from 2007 to 2024, with the majority having been published from 2012 onwards. All of the work was carried out in countries in the northern hemisphere, with Japan predominating (with 6 articles).

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 17 studies included. Together, they evaluated a total of 726 bodies of drowning victims and 477 bodies of victims of deaths from other causes, with a wide age range (1–100 years).





Three studies(7–9) did not compare groups of drowned and non-drowned individuals, focusing instead on describing the findings typical of drowning, comparing PMCT with autopsy.

The causes of death other than drowning covered in the studies include the following: atherosclerotic coronary artery disease; aortic dissection; cardiovascular failure; sudden cardiac death; cerebral causes; trauma; mechanical asphyxia, including that caused by hanging; burns; carbon monoxide poisoning; hypothermia; sudden infant death syndrome; chemical poisoning/exogenous intoxication; and other, unspecified causes.

Kawasumi et al.(8) and Sugawara et al.(10) dedicated themselves to evaluating the PMCT findings in the bodies of drowning victims. In particular, both drew comparisons between fresh-water drowning and salt-water drowning.

In most of the studies reviewed, CT scans were not performed on bodies that were in an advanced stage of putrefaction(3,5,7-16). Some of the studies also excluded the bodies of children(5,8,15,16), and others excluded cases of drowning in bathtubs on the grounds that a cardiovascular event, such as acute myocardial infarction, might represent an underlying pathology and contribute to the cause of death in that situation(13,17).

In studies comparing the two methods, CT scans were performed prior to conventional autopsy, at intervals ranging from a few hours to 12 days postmortem.

Imaging findings

The PMCT examinations were performed in 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, 40-, 64-, 80-, and 160-slice scanners manufactured by GE Healthcare, Toshiba/Canon, Philips, Siemens, or Hitachi. In the studies reviewed, various protocols were used, some encompassing whole-body CT scans and others evaluating scans covering only the area from the skull to the pelvis, with different slice thicknesses, although most mentioned multiplanar reconstructions. No contrast medium was used in any of the PMCT scans acquired. The PMCT images were analyzed by radiologists or forensic pathologists.

Table 2 shows the main PMCT findings in drowning victims and the comparison with autopsy, for the studies that made such a comparison. Some of the studies used only autopsy to confirm the findings indicative of death by drowning but did not describe those findings or compare them with those of the PMCT scan(3,4,10,11,13,14,16,17).





Of the findings described from the PMCT scans of drowning victims studied in this review, fluid in the paranasal sinuses was mentioned by 11 authors, fluid in the airways was mentioned by five, and fluid in the mastoid air cells was mentioned by three. Levy et al.(18) described the presence of frothy fluid and high-attenuation sediment in the airways, representative of sand from salt water or iodine present in fresh water, as specific findings on the PMCT scans of drowning victims. Kawasumi et al.(4) concluded that the presence of fluid in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses was significantly associated with drowning, with a sensitivity of 97%, albeit with a specificity of only 35%, which allows us to state only that the absence of fluid in these sinuses probably excludes drowning. In addition, Kawasumi et al.(3) showed that the volume of fluid in the maxillary or sphenoid sinuses was significantly greater in drowning cases than in non-drowning cases, whereas the fluid density was significantly lower. Kawasumi et al.(8) suggested that the fluid density in the sinuses is a useful indicator to differentiate between drownings in salt water and drownings in fresh water. The cut-off value was 37.77 HU, with a negative predictive value of 91%. Illustrative examples are presented in Figures 2-5.














Other PMCT findings in the bodies of drowning victims included the following: pulmonary parenchymal alterations (crazy-paving pattern, poorly defined centrilobular nodules with diffuse ground-glass opacities, and consolidation); pleural effusion; lowering of the right hemidiaphragm; hemodilution in the cardiac chambers; and fluid distention of the stomach and duodenum. Illustrative examples of parenchymal alterations are shown in Figure 6.





It is noteworthy that Usui et al.(7) categorized the findings in the lungs of drowning victims into six types (described in Table 2). Of those, the type 4 cases did not demonstrate findings on PMCT similar to those considered typical of drowning at autopsy, suggesting that emphysema or fibrosis were preexisting in those lungs prior to death by drowning. Van Hoyweghen et al.(17) showed that there was a statistically significant difference between cases of death by drowning and death from other causes in terms of the height of the right hemidiaphragm. Leth and Madsen(15) found greater lung volume and lower lung density in drowning victims than in victims of death from other causes, both on PMCT and at autopsy. Gotsmy et al. (19) showed that liquid distention of the stomach was stratified into three layers of gastric content on PMCT scans of drowned bodies.


DISCUSSION

This review highlighted the contribution of CT scans as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of death by drowning. Some characteristics were identified only on CT scans, whereas others were identified only at autopsy.

In the studies reviewed, the most common PMCT finding in drowning victims was fluid in the paranasal sinuses, mastoid air cells, and airways. When that fluid is frothy and contains sediment with high attenuation, it becomes a specific finding. The absence of fluid in the sinuses on PMCT makes a drowning diagnosis unlikely. In addition, it has been shown that, in drowning deaths, the volume of fluid in the paranasal sinuses is greater and the density of that fluid is lower than in deaths from other causes. Regarding the type of water in which the drowning occurred (fresh or salt water), a cutoff of 37.77 HU for the density of fluid in the paranasal sinuses on PMCT has been suggested to characterize drowning in salt water; that is, drowning in salt water is unlikely when the fluid density is less than 37.77 HU. Notably, the authors of one study(16) in this review, an animal study, warned that a finding of fluid in the paranasal sinuses should be interpreted with caution, given that it was not shown to distinguish between death by accidental drowning and submersion in water after death.

Other PMCT findings also highlighted in drowned bodies include the following: pulmonary parenchymal changes (crazy-paving pattern, poorly defined centrilobular nodules with diffuse ground-glass opacities, and consolidation); pleural effusion; depression of the right hemidiaphragm; hemodilution in the cardiac chambers; and fluid distention of the stomach and duodenum, often with heterogeneous content. Regarding the last item, Gotsmy et al.(19) suggested that the presence of three layers of gastric contents on PMCT is a strong forensic indication of death by drowning. Concerning hemodilution in the cardiac chambers, the present review documented that it was greater in the left chambers and in cases of drowning in fresh water. Physiologically, this can be explained by the fact that fresh water is hypotonic relative to plasma and is rapidly absorbed in the alveoli, passing into the pulmonary circulation and causing hemodilution. Regarding the pulmonary findings, Usui et al.(7) stated that the phenomenon of aqueous emphysema established at autopsy might explain the appearance of poorly defined centrilobular nodules and diffuse ground-glass opacities on CT.

Paltauf spots, which are areas of subpleural hemorrhage measuring ≥ 2.0 cm, with irregular borders, that are light red in color, caused by the rupture of alveolar walls and blood capillaries. In one study(18), the autopsy identified abrasions on the face and extremities, together with small contusions and occult fractures in the skull base and in a rib, none of which were identified on the PMCT scan.

On the basis of our review, the following PMCT findings can be considered indicative of death by drowning: fluid in the paranasal sinuses; pulmonary parenchymal changes (crazy-paving pattern, poorly defined centrilobular nodules with diffuse ground-glass opacities, and consolidation); pleural effusion; depression of the right hemidiaphragm; hemodilution in the cardiac chambers; and fluid distention of the stomach and duodenum. More specifically, the diagnostic criteria for death by drowning include distention of the stomach with heterogeneous contents, forming at least three layers; the diagnostic criteria for drowning in fresh water include greater hemodilution in the cardiac chambers; and the diagnostic criteria for drowning in salt water include fluid density in the paranasal sinuses with attenuation ≥ 37.77 HU. The absence of fluid in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses is considered an exclusion criterion for death by drowning.

The technical limitations reported in the studies reviewed here include small sample sizes and the difficulty in quantifying the volume and density of paranasal, pulmonary, or gastric fluids through the use of the methods employed to extract such material during conventional autopsy. Other limitations of PMCT include the absence of a well-established examination protocol and the scarcity of qualified professionals in the subspecialty of forensic radiology, given that the accuracy of image interpretation depends on the completeness of the examination performed and the experience of the reader, highlighting the need for the standardization of protocols and ongoing training of professionals. The methodological heterogeneity observed in the 17 articles included in this review can be explained by broad timeframe considered (2007–2024), because the technology and the equipment have evolved, enabling the use of multidetector CT scanners and consequently improving the quality of the examination and shortening examination times, with thinner slices and faster reconstructions, for example. Although justified, that heterogeneity represents a potential limiting factor for the external validity of postmortem imaging findings. In comparison with conventional autopsy, PMCT also presents disadvantages in terms of its capacity to identify superficial lesions, soft-tissue injuries, and cardiovascular diseases.

Extrapolating to the reality in Brazil, we emphasize that there is a significant lack of studies on PMCT conducted in the country and an absence of national parameters. In addition, there is limited number of forensic medicine institutes with access to this technology for the evaluation of cases of drowning (a cause of violent death), currently present only in the cities of São Paulo, Brasília, Campo Grande, Belo Horizonte, Recife, and Goiânia.


CONCLUSION

Pre-autopsy PMCT is a useful tool for visualization and documentation in the diagnosis of death by drowning. Although it can be considered a promising complementary method, it is as yet not a substitute for conventional autopsy.

Among the current technical and structural limitations to the full adoption of PMCT as an isolated postmortem diagnostic alternative, we highlight the absence of a well-established examination protocol due to methodological heterogeneity and the scarcity of physicians qualified in the subspecialty of forensic radiology, which reduces the accuracy of the method. In addition, CT scanners are not widely available at forensic medicine centers around the world.

It is already certain that PMCT complements conventional autopsy for a more assertive diagnosis and will most likely allow an autopsy to be more localized and faster, as well as enabling review of the autopsy report, given that the stored images can be reevaluated at any time and do not constitute evidence that is subject to loss, unlike the body, which is lost to decomposition and the burial process.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the support received from Prof. Dr. Roberto Mogami and Dr. John Robert Pires-Davidson, as well as for the valuable contributions of the collaborators who made this study possible.


REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Drowning [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 13 December 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drowning

2. Christe A, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, et al. Drowning–post-mortem imaging findings by computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2008;18:283e90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0745-4

3. Kawasumi Y, Kawabata T, Sugai Y, et al. Diagnosis of drowning using post-mortem computed tomography based on the volume and density of fluid accumulation in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e562e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.015

4. Kawasumi Y, Kawabata T, Sugai Y, et al. Assessment of the relationship between drowning and fluid accumulation in the paranasal sinuses on post-mortem computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):3953-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.08.011

5. Kakimoto Y, Ohno S, Saito T, et al. Assessment of maxillary sinus fluid volume for postmortem diagnosis of drowning. Radiography. 2024 Jan 1;30(1):308–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.001

6. Daly B, Andrew S, O'Donnell C. The Current and Potential Future Role of Postmortem Computed Tomography in Medicolegal Death Investigation. Acad. Forensic Pathol 2015;5 (4):590-602. DOI: /10.23907/2015.063

7. Usui A, Kawasumi Y, Funayama M, et al. Postmortem lung features in drowning cases on computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol. 2014 Jul;32(7):414-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-014-0326-9

8. Kawasumi Y, Usui A, Sato Y, et al. Distinction between saltwater drowning and freshwater drowning by assessment of sinus fluid on post-mortem computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2016. Apr;26(4):1186-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3909-7

9. Heo JH, Yoon Y, Seo IS, et al. The significance of evaluating sphenoid sinus fluid by postmortem computed tomography in cases of drowning. J Forensic Leg Med. 2023 Jul:97:102551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2023.102551

10. Sugawara M, Ishiyama K, Takahashi S, et al. Postmortem computed tomographic features in the diagnosis of drowning: a comparison of fresh water and salt water drowning cases. Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Mar;37(3):220-229. DOI:10.1007/s11604-018-0802-8

11. Ambrosetti MC, Barbiani C, El-Dalati G, et al. Virtual autopsy using multislice computed tomography in forensic medical diagnosis of drowning. Radiol Med. 2013 Jun; 118:679–687. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0910-y

12. Plaetsen SV, Letter ED, Piette M, et al. Post-mortem evaluation of drowning with whole body CT. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Apr:249:35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.008

13. Mishima S, Suzukia H, Fukunokagaa T, et al. Postmortem computed tomography findings in cases of bath-related death: Applicability and limitation in forensic practice. Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jan:282:195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.030

14. Jian J, Wan L, Shao Y, et al. Postmortem chest computed tomography for the diagnosis of drowning: a feasibility study. Forensic Sciences Research. 2019 Feb 23;1–7. DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1557386

15. Leth PM, Madsen BH. Drowning investigated by post mortem computed tomography and autopsy. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging. 2017 Jun;9:28–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jofri.2017.02.002

16. Tyr A, Zilg B, Gelius T, et al. Postmortem CT analysis of paranasal sinuses using an experimental model of drowning. Int J Legal Med. 2024 Jul;138(4):1401-1409. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03173-8

17. Van Hoyweghen AJL, Jacobs W, Op de Beeck B, et al. Can post-mortem CT reliably distinguish between drowning and non-drowning asphyxiation? International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2014 Jul 17;129(1):159–64. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1037-6

18. Levy AD, Harcke HT, Getz JM, et al. Virtual Autopsy: Two- and Three-dimensional Multidetector CT Findings in Drowning with Autopsy Comparison. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):862–8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2433061009

19. Gotsmy W, Lombardo P, Jackowski C, et al. Layering of stomach contents in drowning cases in post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy. Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jan;133(1):181-188. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018 1850-4.





1. Department of Forensic Medicine, Bioethics, Occupational Medicine, Physical Medicine, and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2. Instituto de Medicina Legal da Polícia Civil do Distrito Federal (IML/PCDF), Brasília, Brazil

a. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-8456
b. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-6146
c. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1473-4480
d. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-0117

Correspondence:
Rachel Zeitoune
Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho, Medicina Física e Reabilitação - Prédio do IOF
Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, Cerqueira César
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246-903
E-mail: raczei@hotmail.com

Editor in charge: Dr. Valdair Francisco Muglia

Received in May 4 2025.
Accepted em October 27 2025.
Publish in April 17 2026.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), effective June 9, 2022. Previously, the journal was licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Site Map



  • SPONSORED BY

Av.Paulista, 37 - 7° andar - Conj. 71 - CEP 01311-902 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil - Phone: (11) 3372-4554 - Fax: (11) 3372-4554

© All rights reserved 2026 - Radiologia Brasileira