OBJECTIVE: Aiming at contributing to the knowledge on doses in computed tomography (CT), this study has the objective of determining dosimetric quantities associated with pediatric abdominal CT scans, comparing the data with diagnostic reference levels (DRL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was developed with a Toshiba Asteion single-slice CT scanner and a GE BrightSpeed multi-slice CT unit in two hospitals. Measurements were performed with a pencil-type ionization chamber and a 16 cm-diameter polymethylmethacrylate trunk phantom. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the values for weighted air kerma index (C_W), but the differences were relevant in values for volumetric air kerma index (C_VOL), air kerma-length product (P_KL,CT) and effective dose. CONCLUSION: Only the C_W values were lower than the DRL, suggesting that dose optimization might not be necessary. However, P_KL,CT and effective dose values stressed that there still is room for reducing pediatric radiation doses. The present study emphasizes the importance of determining all dosimetric quantities associated with CT scans.

Keywords: Pediatric computed tomography scans; Dosimetric quantities; Weighted dose index; Volumetric air kerma index; Air kermalength product.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence that the scan percentage tool used in partial k-space acquisition has on the quality of images obtained with magnetic resonance imaging equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Philips 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner was used in order to obtain phantom images for quality control tests and images of the knee of an adult male. RESULTS: There were no significant variations in the uniformity and signal-to-noise ratios with the phantom images. However, analysis of the high-contrast spatial resolution revealed significant degradation when scan percentages of 70% and 85% were used in the acquisition of T1- and T2-weighted images, respectively. There was significant degradation when a scan percentage of 25% was used in T1- and T2-weighted in vivo images (p < 0.01 for both). CONCLUSION: The use of tools that limit the k-space is not recommended without knowledge of their effect on image quality.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; K-space; Quality control; In vivo magnetic resonance imaging.