Almost two decades ago, it became possible to use coronary computed tomography for the noninvasive assessment of the coronary arteries. That is an extremely accurate method for detecting or excluding coronary artery disease, even the subclinical forms. This pictorial essay aims to show the main imaging findings in 47 coronary computed tomography scans acquired at a general hospital between January 2014 and June 2018. The most common findings were atheromatous plaques (in 87%) and stents (in 34%). There were also incidental findings, not directly related to coronary artery disease, such as pulmonary nodules and aortic stenosis.

Keywords: Multidetector computed tomography; Coronary angiography/methods; Coronary artery disease/diagnostic imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of coronary stenosis (≥ 50% luminal narrowing) determined by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with that determined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA), using segment-by-segment analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the records of patients who underwent CCTA and ICA between January 2014 and June 2018 at a general hospital in Brazil. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was applied, and the areas under the curve were used in order to assess the overall accuracy of the methods. RESULTS: The degree of coronary stenosis was evaluated in a total of 844 arterial segments. The diagnostic performance of CCTA was good, with a sensitivity of 82.3%, a specificity of 96.4%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7% (95% CI: 96.5–98.5). In the segment-by-segment analysis, CCTA had excellent accuracy for the left main coronary artery and for other segments. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice at general hospitals, CCTA appears to have diagnostic performance comparable to that of ICA.

Keywords: Multidetector computed tomography; Coronary angiography/methods; Coronary artery disease/diagnostic imaging.