The iliopsoas compartment, a posterior boundary of the retroperitoneum, is comprised of the psoas major, psoas minor and iliac muscles. The symptoms picture in patients presenting with pathological involvement of this compartment may show a wide range of nonspecific clinical presentations that may lead to delayed diagnosis. However, in the search of an etiological diagnosis, it is already known that inflammation, tumors, and hemorrhages account for almost all the lesions affecting the iliopsoas compartment. By means of a retrospective analysis of radiological studies in patients with iliopsoas compartment lesions whose diagnosis was confirmed by anatomopathological evaluation or clinical follow-up, we have reviewed its anatomy as well as the main forms of involvement, with the purpose of identifying radiological signs that may help to narrow down the potential differential diagnoses. As each lesion is approached we will discuss the main radiological findings such as presence of gas in pyogenic abscesses, bone destruction and other bone changes of vertebral bodies in lesions secondary to tuberculosis, involvement of fascial planes in cases of neoplasms, and differences in signal density and intensity of hematomas secondary to hemoglobin degradation, among others. So, we have tried to present cases depicting the most frequent lesions involving the iliopsoas compartment, with emphasis on those signs that can lead us to a more specific etiological diagnosis.

Keywords: Iliopsoas muscle, Psoas muscle, Computed tomography, Abscesses, Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography studies of patients with acute pancreatitis were blindly reviewed by two radiologists (observers 1 and 2). The morphological index was separately calculated for unenhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography and the disease severity index was established. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of computed tomography was measured by means of the kappa index (kappa). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was kappa = 0.666, 0.705, 0.648, 0.547 and 0.631, respectively for unenhanced and contrast-enhanced morphological index, presence of pancreatic necrosis, pancreatic necrosis extension, and disease severity index. Intraobserver agreement (observers 1 and 2, respectively) was kappa = 0.796 and 0.732 for unenhanced morphological index; kappa = 0.725 and 0.802 for contrast-enhanced morphological index; kappa = 0.674 and 0.849 for presence of pancreatic necrosis; kappa = 0.606 and 0.770 for pancreatic necrosis extension; and kappa = 0.801 and 0.687 for disease severity index at computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography for determination of morphological index and disease severity index in the staging of acute pancreatitis is a quite reproducible method. The absence of contrast-enhancement does not affect the computed tomography morphological index reproducibility.

Keywords: Pancreatitis, X-ray computed tomography, Disease severity index, Prognosis, Contrast media, Necrosis

The use of unenhanced computed tomography has been frequently recommended for the initial assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of acute abdomen instead of other diagnostic methods. The authors present a review of the literature on the main aspects, advantages, limitations and efficacy of unenhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, renal colic, diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, primary epiploic appendicitis, pneumoperitoneum and small bowel obstruction. The advantages and limitations of this technique are also discussed.

Keywords: Appendicitis, Diverticulitis, Acute abdomen, Computed tomography, Contrast media

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of low-field-strength and high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging equipments for evaluation of the patella articular cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was developed using GRE 2D, GRE 3D, FSE T2, STIR sequences (low-field) and TSE T2 SPIR sequence. Each sequence has been separately analyzed for evaluation of the cartilage without knowledge of other sequences results or any patients data; the lesion was assigned a grade from 0 to 3 and had its location defined. Agreement and disagreement results were analyzed by Kappa and McNemar tests. RESULTS: Medial facet has presented low agreement index and disagreements showed to be significantly overestimated. Lateral facet has presented a reasonable agreement index and disagreement index was not significant. Medial ridge has presented a reasonable agreement index and disagreement index has showed to be underestimated. CONCLUSION: The STIR sequence versus TSE T2 SPIR sequence has presented the higher agreement index. High grade lesions are better characterized by low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging equipment sequences. Areas of increased signal intensity make difficult the study of the patella medial facet cartilage in low-field-strength equipment.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging, Skeletal - appendicular, Knee, Comparative study, Equipments, Imaging sequences

OBJECTIVE: To define, by means of computed tomography, the level of ureteral implantation into de bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have measured the distances from the ureteral meatus to the acetabulum, and to the superior margin of the pubic symphysis, as well as the bladder volume, using contrast enhanced computed tomography of the pelvis in 46 patients (31 male and 15 female) in the age range between 18 and 45 years, with at least one of the ureteres filled with excreted contrast material. The Student t test has been applied to determine eventual statistically significant differences between groups. RESULTS: The level of ureteral implantation into the bladder was, on average, 10.6 ± 8.1 mm below the acetabular roof, and 29.7 ± 9.5 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis. In patients with bladder repletion volume of < 200 ml and > 200 ml, the level of ureteral implantation into the bladder was, respectively, on average, 11.6 ± 7.3 mm and 10.2 ± 8.4 mm below the acetabular roof (p = 0.61), and 28.3 ± 7.3 mm and 30.3 ± 10.2 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis (p = 0.52), and in male and female men patients, respectively, on average, 11.8 ± 8.0 mm and 8.3 ± 8.0 mm below the acetabular roof (p = 0.17), and 27.7 ± 9.2 mm and 33.9 ± 8.8 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Calcifications located < 3 cm below the acetabular roof and < 1.5 cm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis probably do not represent ureteral calculi. Vesical repletion or sex have no significant influence on the ureteral meatus position.

Keywords: Calculus, Ureter, Ureteral obstruction, Lithiasis, X-ray computed tomography