OBJECTIVE: The PENELOPE code was utilized to simulate irradiation geometries where heterogeneities are present and to simulate a photon beam behavior under these conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the homogeneous case, the ionizing radiation behavior was simulated only with water, and different materials were introduced to simulate heterogeneous conditions. Cubic geometries were utilized for the homogeneous phantoms, and parallelepiped-shaped geometries for the heterogeneities with the following composition: bone and lung tissue simulators, as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, and titanium, aluminum and silver. Input parameters were defined as follows: energy and type of source, 6 MV photons; source-surface distance=100 cm; and radiation field of 10x 10 cm². RESULTS: Percentage depth-dose curves were obtained for all the cases. As result, it was observed that for high electronic density materials, such as silver, the absorbed dose is higher than the absorbed dose in the homogeneous phantom, and for the lung tissue simulator, it is lower. CONCLUSION: Results clearly demonstrate the relevant role of heterogeneities in the treatment planning system algorithms utilized in the calculation of dose distribution in patients, increasing the accuracy of the dose delivered to the tumor and avoiding unnecessary irradiation of healthy tissues.

Keywords: Radiotherapy, Monte Carlo, PENELOPE, Heterogeneities, Depth-dose distribution

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to verify the effect of changes in subject contrast, exposure time and radiation dose when different thicknesses of molybdenum (Mo) and rhodium (Rh) filters are used in mammography equipments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Entrance skin exposure measurements were performed with an ionization chamber for different thicknesses of Mo and Rh filters. Average glandular dose was determined with a BR12 simulator (50% fat tissue and 50% glandular tissue) of different thicknesses (4 cm and 8 cm). Energies in the range of 24 to 34 kVp and Kodak MinR 2000 films were used. RESULTS: Results have evidenced data on subject contrast data, glandular dose and exposure time for different thicknesses of additional filters and different kVp values. These data have indicated an increase both in values of subject contrast and exposure time when filters thickness is increased. The glandular dose has presented a different behavior tendency for each case analyzed. Equations were defined to allow us to estimate subject contrast, glandular dose and exposure time for the cases studied. CONCLUSION: The results have made possible to define equations to assist with the evaluation of subject contrast and glandular dose behavior in simulators with 4 cm and 8 cm thicknesses and for Rh and Mo additional filters. In this way, it is possible to estimate the figure of merit (subject contrast/glandular dose ratio) to assist in the risk-benefit analysis of the cases studied.

Keywords: Mammography, Radiation exposure, External dosimetry

OBJECTIVE: To present the solidly established traceability structure for ionometric standards and for thermoluminescent dosimetry system that ensures reliability of the Dosimetry Quality Assurance Program and is aimed to certify the highest level of accuracy of the measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent powder dosimeters (DTL 937) placed into plastic capsules and packed in specific kits for each intended application were mailed to the participant centers. RESULTS: The results of the intercomparisons performed between "Laboratório de Ciências Radiológicas da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro" and EQUAL-ESTRO for the beam of 60Co gamma rays, expressed for (1sigma), and the results of the dose absorbed measurements obtained with the chambers of the Program EQUAL and the chambers of the Dosimetry Quality Assurance Program were lower than 0.5%. CONCLUSION: Based on these results we concluded that the Dosimetry Quality Assurance Program reached the desired level of reliability to allow its implementation.

Keywords: Quality assurance, Radiotherapy, Dosimetric intercomparison, Thermoluminescent dosimetry, TLD