OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultrasound sensitivity and reproducibility as compared with magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard in the detection of splenic siderotic nodules in schistosomal patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, 21 patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and diagnosed with splenic siderotic nodules by magnetic resonance imaging were ultrasonographically evaluated for determining the method sensitivity. In a second phase, the method reproducibility in the detection and quantification of siderotic nodules (A: 1-5 nodules; B: 6-20 nodules; C: > 20 nodules) was evaluated in 30 patients who were submitted to ultrasonography blindly and independently assessed by two observers. Interobserver agreement was measured by kappa statistics. RESULTS: Ultrasound sensitivity was 95.2% (95% confidence interval [77.3%; 99.2%]). Intermethod agreement in the detection of siderotic nodules was 96.7% (95% confidence interval [82.8%; 99.9%]). For classification of nodules according to their quantification, the kappa test demonstrated a statistically significant interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is highly sensitive and accurate in the assessment of splenic siderotic nodules in schistosomal patients.

Keywords: Schistosomiasis mansoni, Ultrasonography, Spleen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging and the agreement between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the classification of periportal fibrosis in patients with schistosomiasis based on Niamey's qualitative criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded study was conducted between February 2005 and June 2006 with 20 patients (10 men and 10 women, with ages ranging between 24 and 60 years, mean age 42.7 years) diagnosed with schistosomiasis mansoni. Both ultrasound and magnetic resonance images were independently evaluated by two experienced observers. Interobserver agreement was evaluated for findings of periportal fibrosis on magnetic resonance images and in a comparison between magnetic resonance and ultrasound images. RESULTS: The analysis of magnetic resonance images showed total interobserver agreement in 14 patients (70%). The comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging showed agreement between images in only six cases (30%) by observer 1, and in eight cases (40%) by observer 2. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging presents a good reproducibility in the evaluation of periportal fibrosis in later stages of schistosomiasis, however, the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound is poor.

Keywords: Schistosomiasis, Periportal fibrosis, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE: To determine the intra- and interobserver agreement in the classification of periportal fibrosis, according to the criteria defined at the Niamey Workshop of 1996. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational and transverse study was developed in the period between February, 2005 and March, 2006, in 30 schistosomal patients with no other hepatic findings associated, submitted to abdominal ultrasound. Ultrasonographic studies were independently performed and reviewed by two radiologists at three different moments: the dynamic examination itself (first moment), 30 and 90 days later (second and third moments), by means of the images review performed in a workstation. Intra- and interobserver agreement was evaluated by means of the kappa test. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was 0.43 for the first, and 0.57 for the second observer. Interobserver agreement as regards the dynamic examination and images review was respectively 0.46 and 0.71. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography demonstrated moderate to substantial reproducibility in the classification of periportal fibrosis according to the Niamey criteria.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of results, Fibrosis, Schistosomiasis