OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of visual analysis and of the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score in nontriggered computed tomography (CT), in comparison with that of the CAC score in electrocardiogram-triggered CT, in identifying coronary calcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 174 patients for whom CT was indicated for CAC scoring underwent nontriggered and triggered CT in a 64-channel multislice scanner, in a single session without a change in position. The images were interpreted by a radiologist with seven years of experience in thoracic and cardiovascular radiology. The measurement of coronary calcium was carried out by three methods: CAC score with dedicated software in nontriggered CT, CAC score with dedicated software in triggered CT, and visual analysis without dedicated software in nontriggered CT. RESULTS: In nontriggered CT, the CAC score presented an accuracy of 95.98% (95% CI: 91.93–98.04). The visual analysis showed an accuracy of 97.13% (95% CI: 93.45–98.77). CONCLUSION: Nontriggered CT showed excellent accuracy in the identification and exclusion of coronary calcification, either the CAC score was determined with dedicated software or through visual analysis.

Keywords: Tomography, X-ray computed; Cardiovascular diseases; Coronary disease.