OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed at evaluating the quality and the impact of an intervention involving inspection and education in mammography centers of the Federal District, Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty one mammography centers in the Federal District were studied in the period between 2000 and 2002. The intervention involved an initial inspection followed by a training activity and notification of mammography centers by the Federal District Sanitary Vigilance authority. The imaging quality was compared before and after the intervention. RESULTS: None of the 36 centers which completed the study reached more than 90% compliance with the standard imaging quality prior to the interventions, whereas ten were above 90% afterwards. Major improvements were observed in chassis maintenance, breast compression and visualization of microcalcifications. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of a great number of mammography centers in the Federal District, most of them did not meet the required quality standards. The intervention has shown to be effective for improving the imaging quality, however a continued action is required to solve the remaining problems and increase the impact of the program.

Keywords: Mammography, Quality control, Federal District, Impact

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mean glandular dose with a solid state detector and the image quality in a direct radiography system, utilizing phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Irradiations were performed with automatic exposure control and polymethyl methacrylate slabs with different thicknesses to calculate glandular dose values. The image quality was evaluated by means of the structures visualized on the images of the phantoms. RESULTS: Considering the uncertainty of the measurements, the mean glandular dose results are in agreement with the values provided by the equipment and with internationally adopted reference levels. Results obtained from images of the phantoms were in agreement with the reference values. CONCLUSION: The present study contributes to verify the equipment conformity as regards dose values and image quality.

Keywords: Mean glandular dose; Image; Direct radiography.

OBJECTIVE: Derive filtered tungsten X-ray spectra used in digital mammography systems by means of Monte Carlo simulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Filtered spectra for rhodium filter were obtained for tube potentials between 26 and 32 kV. The half-value layer (HVL) of simulated filtered spectra were compared with those obtained experimentally with a solid state detector Unfors model 8202031-H Xi R/F & MAM Detector Platinum and 8201023-C Xi Base unit Platinum Plus w mAs in a Hologic Selenia Dimensions system using a direct radiography mode. RESULTS: Calculated HVL values showed good agreement as compared with those obtained experimentally. The greatest relative difference between the Monte Carlo calculated HVL values and experimental HVL values was 4%. CONCLUSION: The results show that the filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra and the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code can be used for mean glandular dose determination in mammography.

Keywords: Mammography; X-ray spectra; HVL; Monte Carlo.

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive guide to image quality assessment in diagnostic radiology, emphasizing practical methodologies for radiologists. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care on the basis of the understanding and application of quantitative and qualitative metrics in clinical practice and research. We conducted a review of the literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The search terms included “image quality in radiology”, “quantitative and qualitative assessment”, “modulation transfer function”, “signal-to-noise ratio”, “contrast-to-noise ratio”, “radiation dose optimization”, and “artificial intelligence in image quality assessment”. The review identified the main methodologies for image quality assessment. We analyzed these metrics for their applicability in clinical settings, highlighting their benefits and limitations. In addition, we discuss qualitative methods such as visual assessment, the assessment of contrast/density, and peer review. This guide fills a gap in the literature by providing accessible, practical knowledge for general radiologists. Ongoing research, education, and technological development are essential to advance the field and ensure high standards in radiology practice.

Keywords: Quality control; Image processing, computer-assisted; Radiology; Diagnostic imaging; Practice guideline.