Objective: To describe the MR imaging features of hepatic hemangioma with perilesional enhancement. Materials and methods: A search was performed of the MRI section database to identify all cases of hepatic hemangioma with perilesional enhancement between March 2008 and July 2009. All patients underwent MR examinations including precontrast T1- and T2-weighted images and postgadolinium dynamic images. On MR images, characteristics of the hemangioma and perilesional enhancement were evaluated. Results: Seven hemangiomas in seven patients (five men, two women; age range, 41–69 years; mean, 57 years) were included in this study. Lesion size ranged from 7 to 20 mm (mean, 12.4 mm). On hepatic arterial dominant phase, all seven hemangiomas exhibited wedge-shaped perilesional enhancement which faded on two minutes postgadolinium images. Four of these lesions demonstrated adjacent capsular enhancement. Conclusion: All hepatic hemangiomas with perilesional enhancement were < 2 cm capsulebased lesions. This location suggests that these hemangiomas may conscript capsular vessels to account for the perilesional enhancement.

Keywords: Liver; Liver hemangioma; Liver perfusion; Liver contrast enhancement.

Objective: To prospectively compare full dose gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) with full dose gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) in the detection of focal hepatic lesions in patients with chronic liver disease on MRI. Materials and Methods: Eight patients with hepatic cirrhosis and a strong suspicion for small hepatocellular carcinoma based on prior MRI underwent contrast-enhanced MR examinations, one with full dose Gd-DTPA and one with full dose Gd-BOPTA. The exams were performed from 72–108 hours apart. Two blinded and independent radiologists evaluated images for lesion number, characterization, enhancement, and subjective preference. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two studies for lesion detection or characterization. There was 18% increased lesion enhancement for Gd-BOPTA, compared to Gd-DTPA, of the dominant lesion. Both blinded readers subjectively preferred the images using Gd-BOPTA over Gd-DTPA in the majority of cases, based on greater lesion enhancement and better edge definition. Conclusion: At equivalent full doses, Gd-BOPTA compared similarly with Gd-DTPA in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions in patients with chronic liver disease. However, Gd-BOPTA was superior for increased lesion enhancement and subjective preference of the reader.

Keywords: MultiHance (Gd-BOPTA); Magnevist (Gd-DTPA); Hepatic lesions.