OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultrasound sensitivity and reproducibility as compared with magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard in the detection of splenic siderotic nodules in schistosomal patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, 21 patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and diagnosed with splenic siderotic nodules by magnetic resonance imaging were ultrasonographically evaluated for determining the method sensitivity. In a second phase, the method reproducibility in the detection and quantification of siderotic nodules (A: 1-5 nodules; B: 6-20 nodules; C: > 20 nodules) was evaluated in 30 patients who were submitted to ultrasonography blindly and independently assessed by two observers. Interobserver agreement was measured by kappa statistics. RESULTS: Ultrasound sensitivity was 95.2% (95% confidence interval [77.3%; 99.2%]). Intermethod agreement in the detection of siderotic nodules was 96.7% (95% confidence interval [82.8%; 99.9%]). For classification of nodules according to their quantification, the kappa test demonstrated a statistically significant interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is highly sensitive and accurate in the assessment of splenic siderotic nodules in schistosomal patients.

Keywords: Schistosomiasis mansoni, Ultrasonography, Spleen

OBJECTIVE: To define, by means of computed tomography, the level of ureteral implantation into de bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have measured the distances from the ureteral meatus to the acetabulum, and to the superior margin of the pubic symphysis, as well as the bladder volume, using contrast enhanced computed tomography of the pelvis in 46 patients (31 male and 15 female) in the age range between 18 and 45 years, with at least one of the ureteres filled with excreted contrast material. The Student t test has been applied to determine eventual statistically significant differences between groups. RESULTS: The level of ureteral implantation into the bladder was, on average, 10.6 ± 8.1 mm below the acetabular roof, and 29.7 ± 9.5 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis. In patients with bladder repletion volume of < 200 ml and > 200 ml, the level of ureteral implantation into the bladder was, respectively, on average, 11.6 ± 7.3 mm and 10.2 ± 8.4 mm below the acetabular roof (p = 0.61), and 28.3 ± 7.3 mm and 30.3 ± 10.2 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis (p = 0.52), and in male and female men patients, respectively, on average, 11.8 ± 8.0 mm and 8.3 ± 8.0 mm below the acetabular roof (p = 0.17), and 27.7 ± 9.2 mm and 33.9 ± 8.8 mm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Calcifications located < 3 cm below the acetabular roof and < 1.5 cm above the superior margin of the pubic symphysis probably do not represent ureteral calculi. Vesical repletion or sex have no significant influence on the ureteral meatus position.

Keywords: Calculus, Ureter, Ureteral obstruction, Lithiasis, X-ray computed tomography

PET/CT is widely used for the evaluation of patients with thoracic malignancies. Although the levels of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake are usually high in neoplastic diseases, they can also be physiological, due to artifacts. In addition, FDG uptake can occur in benign conditions such as infectious, inflammatory, and iatrogenic lesions. Furthermore, some malignant tumors, such as adenocarcinoma in situ (formerly known as bronchoalveolar carcinoma) and carcinoid tumors, may not show FDG uptake. Here, we illustrate the main pitfalls and artifacts in the interpretation of the results of oncologic PET/CT of the chest, outlining strategies for avoiding misinterpretation.

Keywords: Pitfalls; Chest; PET/CT; Oncology.