OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are substantive differences between the initial interpretations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired at outside facilities and the second-opinion interpretations of radiologists specializing in gynecologic oncology at a tertiary cancer center, among patients referred for endometrial cancer staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative analysis of 153 initial and second-opinion MRI reports for endometrial cancer staging officially submitted for review by radiologists specializing in gynecologic oncology. For each case, the relationship between the initial and second-opinion reports, regarding the suggested diagnosis and the clinically relevant MRI findings reported, was categorized as “agreement” or “disagreement”. Histopathology was used in order to establish the definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: Disagreement was found in 58 (37.9%) of the 153 cases. Second-opinion interpretations reported findings that affected the preoperative cancer staging and could have led to a change in treatment in 38 cases (24.8%); that did not affect the preoperative staging but provided information that was more accurate in 8 (5.2%); and that suggested a new cancer diagnosis in 12 (7.8%). In 37 cases (24.2%), there was a potential for changes in patient care. Among the 58 cases of disagreement, a definitive (histopathological) diagnosis was made in 41 (70.7%). In 31 (75.6%) of those 41 cases, the second-opinion report was more accurate than was the initial report. CONCLUSION: Discordant interpretations of MRI examinations, which can have a substantial effect on the clinical management of patients, appear to be common.

Keywords: Endometrial neoplasm/diagnostic imaging; Referral and consultation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnostic imaging; Tertiary care centers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer, in comparison with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving 44 women with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative 1.5 T MRI. Two radiologists, both of whom were blinded to the histopathology reports, performed a consensus interpretation of the depth of myometrial invasion and of the stage of the cancer, considering three sets of sequences: T2WI, DCE-MRI+T2WI, and DWI+T2WI. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each set. The accuracy was compared with p-value adjustment by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: Among the 44 patients evaluated, DWI+T2WI demonstrated better diagnostic performance in assessing deep myometrial invasion and correctly staged more patients (n = 41) than did DCE-MRI+T2WI (n = 34) and T2WI (n = 22). The superior diagnostic accuracy of DWI+T2WI was statistically significant in comparison with T2WI (p < 0.05) but not in comparison with DCE-MRI+T2WI (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of DWI apparently improves the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the preoperative assessment of the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer, which may be particularly helpful in patients for whom contrast agents are contraindicated.

Keywords: Endometrial neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gynecology; Neoplasms; Endometrium/pathology.