OBJECTIVE: The process of migration from analog to digital imaging system requires specific attention to preserve images quality and minimizing the dose to the patients. The present study was aimed at analyzing and comparing images quality and entrance and exist air kerma measurements in a non-anthropomorphic chest phantom with analog and CR digital imaging systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different X-ray units (Siemens and Emic) with different wave rectification systems (12-pulse and high-frequency) were utilized in a single institution along the process of migration from analog to CR digital imaging system. Images were acquired on films and image plates. RESULTS: An increase on the X-ray tube peak voltage and/or load was observed in the migration from analog to CR digital system to preserve the diagnostic quality of the image. As a result, an increase in the air kerma rate was observed. CONCLUSION: The greatest differences (increase in dose and decrease in image quality) were observed with the 12-pulse wave rectification system with the CR image transducer (imaging plates).

Keywords: Computed radiography, Image quality, Air kerma

OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed at evaluating the absorbed dose in air in a medical examination room during a mammography simulation, to re-evaluate the level of patients' exposure as well as the necessity of radiological protection barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data regarding absorbed dose in air were collected during mammography simulation with a BR12 breast phantom in a Senograph 600T-Senix HF mammograph. For this purpose, 158 CaSO4 dosimeters were distributed over rectangular grids around the bucky at three different heights. RESULTS: The highest value for absorbed dose in air recorded on the center of the phantom surface and centralized on the primary beam was 8.33 mGy, while the lowest value recorded exclusively due to radiation scattering was 0.008 mGy. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the utilization of additional shielding in mammography facilities might not be necessary for craniocaudal acquisition, provided the distances considered for the present study are observed. However, the necessity of radiation protection of the patient should be emphasized.

Keywords: Radioprotection, Isodose curves, Mammography

OBJECTIVE: To develop of a software tool for evaluation and control of sensitometric curves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A method was developed for obtaining high- and low-contrast films sensitometric values, with no need to define wedge steps. RESULTS: The software named Sensito was implemented and tested utilizing data of sensitometric strips from conventional radiology, hemodynamics, and mammography departments. The feasibility of analyzing sensitometric curves from these areas remained evidenced with no need of user-dependent adjustments, and with no deviation in the evaluated sensitometric parameters and variations. CONCLUSION: The software allows the creation of a database including sensitometric curves from different processors in a same institution, easily generating gamma curves of a register and constant charts of the evaluated sensitometric characteristics, constituting an important tool for sensitometric control.

Keywords: Automatic processor, Sensitometric curve, Sensitometry

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to verify the effect of changes in subject contrast, exposure time and radiation dose when different thicknesses of molybdenum (Mo) and rhodium (Rh) filters are used in mammography equipments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Entrance skin exposure measurements were performed with an ionization chamber for different thicknesses of Mo and Rh filters. Average glandular dose was determined with a BR12 simulator (50% fat tissue and 50% glandular tissue) of different thicknesses (4 cm and 8 cm). Energies in the range of 24 to 34 kVp and Kodak MinR 2000 films were used. RESULTS: Results have evidenced data on subject contrast data, glandular dose and exposure time for different thicknesses of additional filters and different kVp values. These data have indicated an increase both in values of subject contrast and exposure time when filters thickness is increased. The glandular dose has presented a different behavior tendency for each case analyzed. Equations were defined to allow us to estimate subject contrast, glandular dose and exposure time for the cases studied. CONCLUSION: The results have made possible to define equations to assist with the evaluation of subject contrast and glandular dose behavior in simulators with 4 cm and 8 cm thicknesses and for Rh and Mo additional filters. In this way, it is possible to estimate the figure of merit (subject contrast/glandular dose ratio) to assist in the risk-benefit analysis of the cases studied.

Keywords: Mammography, Radiation exposure, External dosimetry

Objective: To compare data regarding dosimetry and photons fluence in different breast phantoms, discussing constancy tests and dosimetry applied to mammography. Materials and methods: Different homogeneous breast phantoms and one anthropomorphic voxel phantom were developed for collection of data regarding total absorbed dose in the phantom, absorbed dose in the glandular tissue material-equivalent, absorbed dose and photons fluence at different depths in the phantoms. A simulated ionization chamber collected the entrance skin kerma. Target-filter combinations (Mo-30Mo and Mo-25Rh) were studied for different accelerating potentials of 26 kVp to 34 kVp. Results: As compared with the voxel phantom, the normalized glandular dose resulted in differences from –15% to –21% for RMI, –10% for PhantomMama, and 10% for the Barts and Keithley models. The half-value layer variation was generally < 10% for all the sensitive volumes. Conclusion: The phantom proposed by Dance is recommended for evaluating the glandular dose and normalized glandular dose in a standard breast. Homogeneous phantoms should be utilized for constancy tests in dosimetry, but they are not appropriate for estimating dosimetry in actual patients.

Keywords: Mammography; Dosimetry; Monte Carlo simulation; Geant4.

Objective: To evaluate the intermethod agreement in the measurement of compression force as well as variations in the testing of different mammography systems. Materials and Methods: Ten compression force measurements were performed for each proposed method on each mammography apparatus (Mammomat 3000-Siemens, Mammo Diagnostic UC-Philips and Alpha ST-GE), with an evaluation of the differences among the mammographic equipments as far as the application of such measurement methods is concerned, as well as the differences among the applied methods. Results: Significant differences were observed among the results for the different systems and methods, and the values measured with the aid of a bathroom-scale-type dynamometer resulted in compression force underestimation. Each compression system presented different responses for the proposed methods. Conclusion: Differences were observed among compression systems and among proposed methods. Thus the choice of the way the compression test is performed is critical for the acceptance of the mammography equipment, the technical lead being the most competent to define the most appropriate and realistic testing method. It is suggested that the compression force measurement should be performed with an extension dynamometer, rather than with a compression dynamometer, in cases where the mammography compression system functioning is not known.

Keywords: Mammography; Compression force; Quality control.

OBJECTIVE: To present a data analysis toolkit that may be utilized with the purpose of radiation protection of hospital inpatients and workers in areas where mobile apparatuses are used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Excel^® ActiveSheet was utilized to develop a computational toolkit with exposure measurements to generate a database of shape factors and to calculate the air kerma around hospital beds. The initial database included data collected with three mobile apparatuses. A non-anthropomorphic phantom was utilized and exposure measurements were performed on a (4.2 × 4.2) m² mesh-grid at 0.3 m steps. RESULTS: The toolkit calculates the air kerma (associated with patients' radiation exposure and with ambient equivalent dose) under secondary radiation. For distances lower than 60.0 cm, values above the maximum ambient equivalent dose threshold defined for radiation free areas (0.5 mSv/year) were verified. Data collected at 2.1 m have always presented values lower than 12% of that threshold. CONCLUSION: The toolkit can aid in the radiological protection of patients and workers, provided it is combined with appropriate data collection, since it allows the determination of radiation free areas around beds in rooms where mobile X-ray apparatuses are utilized.

Keywords: Radiology; Radiological protection; Software toolkit.