OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiological findings in patients submitted to surgical treatment for medullary breast cancer at Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, correlating them with histological results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was developed with patients submitted to surgery at INCA, in the period from January 1997 to December 2006, for identifying the presence of medullary breast carcinoma and analyzing radiological findings. RESULTS: Among 21,287 patients diagnosed with carcinoma, 76 (0.357%) had typical medullary breast carcinoma. The age range of these patients was 32-81 years (mean = 59.1 years). Mammography demonstrated lesions in 19 of these patients, 17 (89.5%) of them with masses, and 2 with focal asymmetry. Among the patients with masses, 15 (88.1%) presented with high density and 2 (11.9%) with isodensity. Twelve patients presented sonographic findings, 11 (91.6%) of them with hypoechoic masses, and one with an anechoic mass with areas of cystic degeneration. CONCLUSION: Nodular mass was the predominant radiological finding (89.5%), 88.1% of them corresponding to masses with high density and circumscribed margins. Despite the radiological characteristics of benignity, a solid, fast-growing, highly dense mass with circumscribed margins should be further investigated to confirm the diagnosis.

Keywords: Medullary breast cancer, Radiological findings, Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature about the positive predictive value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A research was performed in the online Medline database, entering the terms "predictive value" and "BI-RADS". Eleven studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The positive predictive values ranged respectively between 0% and 8%, 4% and 62%, and 54% and 100% for BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5. Three studies have also evaluated morphological criteria with higher positive predictive value in mammography, mass with spiculated margins being the finding with highest positive predictive value for malignancy. CONCLUSION: A high variability was found in the reviewed literature among positive predictive values of BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5, although methodological differences have been identified, limiting the comparative analysis.

Keywords: Mammography, BI-RADS®, Breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To present an audit model for mammography results used on the examinations performed at "Centro de Diagnóstico Mamário da Santa Casa da Misericórdia do Rio de Janeiro", Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1997 and September 1998, 2,000 mammography examinations were performed, 1,570 in asymptomatic women, which results were assessed in this audit. RESULTS: The mammography examinations of the asymptomatic women were classified as follow: category 1 - 1,362 cases; category 2 - 9 cases; category 3 - 95 cases; category 4 - 24 cases; category 5 - 6 cases; category 0 - 74 cases. Out of 199 abnormal examinations (categories 0, 3, 4 and 5), 107 (54%) were followed-up and 92 (46%) were lost to follow-up. The 107 cases included in the study were classified as follows: category 3 - 48 cases; category 4 - 18 cases; category 5 - 4 cases; category 0 - 37 cases. No cases of cancer were detected among the 48 cases in category 3; two cases of cancer were seen among the 18 cases in category 4; all four cases in category 5 were cancer; one case of cancer was seen among the 37 cases in category 0. The audit values obtained were the following: positive predictive value (based on the exam with abnormal result) - 11%; positive predictive value (when there was indication for biopsy) - 31%. The rate of cancer detection in 1,570 women was of seven cases; the sensitivity was 100%; the specificity was 96%; and the recall rate was 4.7%. CONCLUSION: All these results reproduce data from the literature.

Keywords: Audit, Mammography, BI-RADS

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adherence of a hospital female personnel to a program for breast cancer prevention by means of mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was developed with 91 female workers evaluated by means of a questionnaire and follow-up of the periodicity of mammographic studies in the period from 2000 to 2009. RESULTS: A total of 247 mammography studies were performed. Compliance with the periodicity schedule was informed by 48 of the participants, 12.6% of them by medical request, 47.9% because they were aware of the relevance of such study, 4.1% because of previous family history of cancer, and 35.4% as a clinical routine. Forty-three participants did not comply with the periodicity schedule, 37.3% of them because they had not a medical request, 20.9% because they could not have it done through the Sistema Único de Saúde (Brazilian Unified Health System), 18.6% for fear, and 23.2% due to unawareness about the relevance of such an examination. CONCLUSION: The participation in the program was low. The adherence to the program was poor in the hospital because of the unawareness about breast cancer prevention.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Secondary prevention; Health care; Hospital environment.

OBJECTIVE: To present the current recommendations for breast cancer screening in Brazil, as devised by the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, the Brazilian Breast Disease Society, and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecological and Obstetrical Associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed scientific studies available in the Medline and Lilacs databases. In the absence of evidence, the recommendations reflected the consensus of a panel of experts. RECOMMENDATIONS: Annual mammography screening is recommended for women 40–74 years of age. Among women ≥ 75 years of age, annual mammography screening should be reserved for those with an expected survival > 7 years. Complementary ultrasound should be considered for women with dense breasts. Complementary magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for women at high risk. When available, an advanced form of mammography known as tomosynthesis can be considered as a means of screening for breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging.