OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of acceptance of patients undergoing computed tomography colonography (CTC) in comparison with colonoscopy in the screening of colorectal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with suspected colorectal disease underwent CTC and colonoscopy. Questionnaires were administered before and after the performance of the CTC and after the colonoscopy. The discomfort expected and experienced before and after the performance of both procedures as well as the patients’ preference for each method were evaluated. RESULTS: As regards CTC, before the procedure, 18% of the patients reported expecting little discomfort, 78%, mild discomfort, and 4%, a lot of discomfort. After the procedure, 72% of the patients reported little discomfort, 26%, mild discomfort, and only one (2%) of the patients reported a lot of discomfort. Upon completion of the colonoscopy, 86% of the patients reported their preference for CTC. The degree of colonic distention and residual amount of fluid had no influence on the patients’ preference. Conclusion: CTC was preferred to colonoscopy, with no statistical relationship with the degree of colonic distention at CTC and efficiency of bowel preparation.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Virtual colonoscopy; Computed tomography colonography; Computed tomography; Patients’ preference; Patients’ satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To map the view of surgeons on the role played by computed tomography colonography (CTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to members of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. The questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-choice questions about demographics and general knowledge about CTC. RESULTS: The authors obtained 144 responses; 90.3% of the specialists were men, 60% with less than 30 years from graduation, 77.1% were gastrointestinal surgeons, 22.9% were general surgeons, 53.5% were involved in academic activity, and 59.7% had their professional activity in cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants. As regards the knowledge about CTC, 84.7% of the respondents knew the method, 70.8% knew how it is performed, 56.9% reported knowing the bowel preparation used for the procedure, 31.3% used the method, and 53.5% knew some CTC service in their city. About half of the respondents did not know the precise indication of the method. The method is most frequently known and used by professionals working in cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants (p < 0.005). There was a tendency of a more frequent use of the method by the professionals pursuing an academic career. CONCLUSION: Despite its infrequent use in Brazil, CTC is a well known method, particularly in large urban centers and in the academic environment.

Keywords: Computed tomography colonography; Computed tomography; Physician's practice patterns.