OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed at sonographically determining the liver size in healthy newborns, infants and children under 7 years of age, correlating results with age, sex, height, body weight and body mass index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 584 healthy children subdivided into 11 age groups were evaluated with measurements of the left lobe craniocaudal diameter at the midsternal line, and the craniocaudal diameter of the right lobe posterior surface at the midclavicular line. The following tests were utilized for statistical analysis: a) Pearson's correlation coefficient (correlation study); b) non-paired Student's t-test (comparison of measures between sexes); c) nonlinear regression models (nomograms). RESULTS: The liver size presented a progressive growth from the birth up to the age of 7, proportionally lower than the body growth, in correlation with age, height and body weight (r > 0.70). Correlation with the body mass index was not observed (r < 0.11). There was no significant difference in liver size between male and female individuals. CONCLUSION: Liver size was sonographically determined in healthy children under the age of 7 by means of a standardized method, demonstrating a strong correlation with age and anthropometric indicators. Nomograms demonstrate the typical variations of the liver size in the population evaluated with a different growth pattern for each hepatic lobe.

Keywords: Liver, Liver size, Biometry, Child, Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are: (1) to standardize the sonographic biometry method to determine the size of the liver in children in order to obtain a greater precision of the section planes and to minimize operator-dependant error; (2) to test intra-observer reproducibility. CASUISTIC AND METHOD: Sonographic measurements of the liver were performed by a single examiner in 32 children (aged 0 to 6 years) with no liver or biliary system disease. The measurements were done in two different occasions (exams 1 and 2) to determine reproducibility. The section planes were based on external orientation lines related to intra-abdominal anatomic references, both extra and intra-hepatic. The values obtained in exams 1 and 2 were compared using a Student's paired t-test. The Pearson's coefficient was employed to determine the correlation among parameters as well as the correlation between the children's age and the difference in the values of exams 1 and 2. RESULTS: The statistical analysis revealed no significant intra-observer variability and no significant correlation between measurements' difference and children's age. In general, parameters were directly and highly correlated (r > 0.60). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the method is reproducible when performed by a same examiner. The measurements of the cranio-caudal diameter at the midsternal line and the posterior cranio-caudal diameter at the midclavicular line, based on intra-hepatic anatomic references, were precise and easier to perform than other routine measurements.

Keywords: Liver size, Biometry, Children, Ultrasound

BACKGROUND: The diversity of existing techniques for the measurement of the spleen using Doppler ultrasound (Doppler-US) as well as the lack of biometrical and Doppler velocimetry reference values make the evaluation of this organ and its hemodynamics quite difficult. OBJECTIVES: To establish biometrical and hemodynamics Doppler-US standard values for healthy adult individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study involving 44 healthy individuals (19 males and 25 females) with mean age of 37.4 ± 9.6 years (23-60 years). Morphometry (US-B mode): spleen: longitudinal (L), transversal (T) and anteroposterior (AP) axes; splenic artery diameter (AD) and splenic vein diameter (VD). Morphometrical spleen indexes: uniplanar (UI), biplanar (BI) and the splenic volume (SV). Doppler velocimetry (US-Doppler): a) splenic artery: systolic peak velocity (SPV), mean of the highest flow speeds (TAMax); pulsability index (PI) and vascular impedance resistivity index(RI); b) splenic vein: mean of the highest flow speeds (TAMax). RESULTS: Morphometry: L = 9.3 ± 1.3 cm; T= 3.9 ± 0.7 cm; AP = 8.4 ± 1.2 cm; AD = 0.3 ± 0.07 cm; VD: 0.5 ± 0.12 cm. Morphometrical spleen indexes: UI = 33.5 ± 9.9; BI = 36.7 ± 10.3; SV = 164.3 ± 62.9 cm³. Doppler velocimetry: a) splenic artery: SPV = 59.8 ± 23.6 cm/s; TAMax = 40.2 ± 15.9 cm/s; PI = 0.86 ± 0.30; RI = 0.55 ± 0.09; b) splenic vein: TAMax = 16.8 ± 8.3 cm/s. CONCLUSION: Report of biometrical and Doppler velocimetry standard values of the spleen in healthy individuals.

Keywords: Spleen, Splenic biometry, Ultrasound, Doppler

Objective: To evaluate the role of ultrasonography in the assessment of histopathological changes in patients with chronic hepatitis C, with emphasis on hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: Liver ultrasonography results were compared with histopathological findings of liver biopsy of 192 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. All the US examinations followed a single protocol, analyzing the following aspects: echogenicity, echotexture and attenuation. The patients sample was divided into two groups as follows: patients with sonographic changes and patients with no sonographic changes. Sonographic findings of both groups were compared with histopathological findings after liver biopsy. Results: Statistically significant intergroup differences were observed just regarding architectural changes grades 0 and 3 and hepatic steatosis. Attenuation was the sonographic criterion that was best correlated with hepatic steatosis. Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, ultrasonography has limitations in the characterization of histopathological changes, with an intermediate rate of agreement with the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Considering the specificity of 77.9% and the negative predictive value of 95.5%, the authors highlight the capacity of the method to demonstrate the probability of absence of hepatic steatosis.

Keywords: Ultrasonography; Chronic hepatitis C virus infection; Hepatic steatosis; Liver biopsy.