Early magnetic resonance angiography techniques used flow-sensitive sequences to obtain contrast of the vascular structures. Three techniques are based on this approach: phase-contrast, time-of-flight and black blood techniques. However, these acquisition methods are time-consuming and more susceptible to movement artifacts, flow-related artifacts and signal loss due to stenotic lesions. They also present low sensitivity for slow flow detection. The use of paramagnetic contrast medium in magnetic resonance angiography studies provides a simple and quick way of obtaining vascular enhancement. Image contrast is based on vascular enhancement in opposition to background suppression. Important factors for the technical improvement of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography include modern techniques of central k-space ordering that are responsible for high image contrast, and implementation of appropriate timing injection. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is a useful diagnostic tool for investigation of anatomical anomalies, stenotic and occlusive disease, and surgical complications, particularly in patients with organ transplants. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography has the advantage of a noninvasive method since it does not require ionizing radiation or an iodine contrast medium, and allows the evaluation of parenchymatous structures for additional diagnostic information.

Keywords: Angiography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Gadolinium

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of oral ranitidine on the imaging quality in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent MRCP with 3D and 2D acquisitions, and three strategies for suppression of the gastrointestinal fluid signal: a) only at fasting; b) 12 hours after ingestion of 300 mg ranitidine; c) after oral administration of gadolinium solution. Three observers reviewed the images with a focus on the degree of visualization of the biliopancreatic tree. The interobserver agreement was evaluated with the kappa test. The difference between techniques and acquisition modalities were evaluated by means of average grading scores. RESULTS: The three strategies for suppression of the gastrointestinal fluid signal presented high reproducibility. The results with suppression of the gastrointestinal fluid signal with ranitidine where similar to those obtained with fasting, and both were worse than those obtained with gadolinium solution. The 3D acquisitions surpassed 2D only in terms of visibility of the cystic duct and gallbladder, and were inferior or equivalent in the other biliopancreatic ductal segments. CONCLUSION: The use of ranitidine does not seem justified in the evaluation of the biliopancreatic tree at MRCP, since 2D MRCP with fasting allows the visualization of ductal structures with high quality and reproducibility in the majority of cases.

Keywords: Ranitidine; Diagnostic use; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Contrast media; Bile ducts; Pancreatic ducts.