Radiologia Brasileira - Publicação Científica Oficial do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically used as a complementary imaging tool when congenital abnormalities are detected during prenatal ultrasound. Fetal MRI facilitates accurate diagnoses because it provides important anatomical information that can be helpful in planning prenatal and postnatal early care, thereby reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality⁽¹⁾.

Developments and modifications in the hardware and software employed in MRI have improved its diagnostic accuracy in fetal studies. Several studies have emphasized the benefit of MRI in evaluating congenital anomalies of the brain and lungs, as well as complex syndromes, in the fetus^(1–3). However, few studies have investigated the contribution of MRI to the diagnosis of skeletal abnormalities of the fetus^(4–8).

Skeletal dysplasia has an incidence of approximately 2 cases per 10,000 live births; it is fatal in approximately 50% of the affected infants⁽⁹⁾. The condition can occur in isolation or in combination with genetic syndromes. Prenatal diagnosis (of the fetus) is essential for proper genetic counseling, prognosis, and postnatal management.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a modified MRI technique that employs a T2-weighted three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo volumetric sequence for the evaluation of the fetal skeleton.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study based on data related to pregnant patients who were referred for fetal MRI as part of their clinical care after abnormalities were identified during routine ultrasound examinations. The period of the study was from March 2012 to March 2013. The local institutional review board approved the study, and the need for written, informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: singleton pregnancy; suspicion of fetal congenital anomaly for which the diagnosis was not conclusive on ultrasound examination; and gestational age > 22 weeks, as determined from the date of onset of the last menstrual period and confirmed by an ultrasound examination performed within the first 16 weeks of pregnancy. Women who were claustrophobic were excluded, as were those in whom oligohydramnios or obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m²) made it difficult to interpret the ultrasound images.

The MRI examinations were performed in a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Aera; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and were guided by a multidisciplinary team. A surface coil was placed on the abdomen of the patients, who were positioned in the supine or left lateral position, whichever was more comfortable. The following protocol was used: T2-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences (repetition time/echo time [TR/TE] = 1000/140 ms, field of view = 300–200 mm, and acquisition matrix = 256 × 256) with a slice thickness of 4 mm, an acquisition time of 18 s, and the acquisition of 40 slices in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes of the fetus; 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TR/TE = 3.16/1.4 ms and isotropic voxel size = 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm), with an acquisition time of 23 s and the acquisition of 96 slices; and modified volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences (TR/TE = 11.0/9.53 ms, flip angle = 4°, and field of view = 380 mm), with a slice thickness of 2 mm, the acquisition of 60 slices, and an interslice gap of 0 mm. Neither intravenous contrast nor sedation was used in any of the cases.

The 3D images of the fetal skeletons were analyzed after data had been acquired and subsequently reconstructed by an MRI technician on a workstation and the Aera platform (Siemens Healthineers) using the minimum intensity projection (MinIP), 3D maximum intensity projection (MIP), and 3D volume rendering technique (VRT) editor imaging tools (Figures 1–5). After the images had been acquired, the fetal skeleton was evaluated by three readers (two pediatric radiologists and one obstetrician, all of whom were experienced in fetal imaging).




RESULTS

The study group included 22 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 ± 7.29 years (range, 15–43 years), and the mean gestational age of the fetuses was 29.3 ± 3.39 weeks (range, 22–35 weeks). We were able to evaluate the fetal skeleton via 3D reconstructions in all of the MRI examinations. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the sample, including fetal diagnosis, maternal age, and gestational age.




In our sample, there were no cases of maternal obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m²) or oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index < 5 cm). Each MRI examination was completed within 30 min, and the acquisition of the modified VIBE sequence did not significantly lengthen the examination, the mean duration of the modified VIBE sequences being 18 s.


DISCUSSION

A review of the literature showed that substantial advances have been made in the use of MRI to evaluate the fetal skeleton. Although not a substitute, MRI complements ultrasound because it is not limited by the fetal position, maternal obesity, or oligohydramnios. However, the accuracy of both methods can be slightly reduced if there is pronounced fetal movement or severe oligohydramnios.

The multiplanar reconstruction of MRI images enabled the complete evaluation of the fetus and contributed to the characterization of the fetal skeleton. Despite the small size of our sample, image reconstruction of the skeleton allowed the identification of defects in the long bones of the fetus, and this technique provided good resolution, thus allowing the definitive diagnoses to be made. Nemec et al.⁽⁴⁾ characterized the fetal skeleton using other MRI techniques, such as the acquisition of echo-planar imaging, thick-slab T2-weighted, and dynamic steady-state free precession sequences, and the characterization of all the parts of the fetal skeleton achieved with those sequences was comparable to that obtained with the modified VIBE sequences. We found that MRI with a modified VIBE sequence was more useful than was 3D ultrasound because the latter depends on the position of the fetus. The main goal of the present study was to propose a new MRI sequence for the diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia in fetuses.

We believe that our study has shown that the use of the modified VIBE sequence in MRI examinations creates the possibility of reconstructing the 3D images for the complete characterization of the fetal skeleton. However, this was a pilot study, and the evaluation of the hands and feet of the fetus continues to be a challenge. Unlike previously examined sequences^(10–12), which displayed only certain parts of the fetal skeleton, the modified VIBE sequences allowed the depiction of the entire fetal skeleton.

Previous studies have described a sequence that allows complete 3D evaluation—the thick-slab T2-weighted sequence⁽¹¹⁾. The thick-slab T2-weighted sequence differs from the modified VIBE sequence in that a single acquisition is performed in 1 s and the image is reproduced by simulating a 3D evaluation. However, the modified VIBE sequence performs a true 3D analysis and has some advantages over 3D computed tomography and 3D ultrasound in the characterization of the entire skeleton. In comparison with 3D ultrasound, MRI is not limited by excess adipose tissue, oligohydramnios, or fetal movements. In comparison with 3D computed tomography, MRI with the modified VIBE sequence does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation^(12,13).

As previously mentioned, including the modified VIBE sequence for the characterization of the fetal skeleton did not significantly increase the duration of the MRI examination, because the estimated mean duration of the proposed sequence was 18 s, the total time of the examination being 30 min. It has been established that skeletal anomalies of the fetus can occur in isolation or in combination with chromosomal defects⁽¹⁴⁾, such anomalies being diagnosed in the prenatal period through the use of imaging methods and genetic testing⁽¹⁵⁾. Making the diagnosis in the prenatal period allows appropriate counseling of the parents regarding the prognosis, natural history, and risk of recurrence of the disease in the fetus. The management of cases of pregnancy involving fetal skeletal anomalies depends on three factors: gestational age at the time of diagnosis, severity of the disease, and the decisions made by the parents. When a skeletal anomaly is detected, the whole fetus should be evaluated in order to identify other associated anomalies. The presence or absence of findings on an MRI examination of the fetus using MRI can help determine whether the skeletal anomaly is independent of or associated with other anomalies. This ability to detect anomalies of the fetus is a major contribution of MRI.


CONCLUSION

In summary, the modified VIBE MRI sequence enabled detailed characterization of the fetal skeleton via 3D reconstructions of the images acquired, allowing the complete evaluation of the fetal skeleton. However, the proposed sequence has one limitation: it shows inadequate accuracy while evaluating the extremities of the fetus. Therefore, improvements to the sequence should be addressed in future studies.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the technicians Márcio Bernardes da Silva, João Victor Altamiro Costa, and Genilson Pereira Menezes for their support in the formulation of the sequence, as well as in the acquisition and reformatting of the images.


REFERENCES

1. Amim B, Werner Jr H, Daltro PA, et al. The value of fetal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of diaphragmatic hernias. Radiol Bras. 2008;41:1–6.

2. Breysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S, et al. The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1538–48.

3. Salomon LJ, Garel C. Magnetic resonance imaging examination of the fetal brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:1019–32.

4. Nemec U, Nemec SF, Krakow D, et al. The skeleton and musculature on foetal MRI. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:309–18.

5. Behairy NH, Talaat S, Saleem SN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in fetal anomalies: what does it add to 3D and 4D US? Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:250–5.

6. Morcuende JA, Weinstein SL. Developmental skeletal anomalies. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2003;69:197–207.

7. Krakow D, Lachman RS, Rimoin DL. Guidelines for the prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med. 2009;11:127–33.

8. Kubik-Huch RA, Huisman TA, Wisser J, et al. Ultrafast MR imaging of the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1599–606.

9. Dighe M, Fligner C, Cheng E, et al. Fetal skeletal dysplasia: an approach to diagnosis with illustrative cases. Radiographics. 2008;28:
1061–77.

10. Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Vladimirov A, et al. Foetal “black bone” MRI: utility in assessment of the foetal spine. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:
20140496.

11. Perrone A, Savelli S, Maggi C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology. Radiol Med. 2008;113:
225–41.

12. Cassart M, Massez A, Cos T, et al. Contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:537–43.

13. Werner H, dos Santos JR, Fontes R, et al. Additive manufacturing models of fetuses built from three-dimensional ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:355–61.

14. Frates MC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB, et al. Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology. 2004;232:398–404.

15. Warman ML, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:943–68.










1. Clínica de Diagnóstico Por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2. Department of Maternal-Infant Care, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil
3. Department of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM-Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence:
Dr. Edward Araujo Júnior
Rua Belchior de Azevedo, 156, ap. 111, Torre Vitória, Vila Leopoldina
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05089-030
E-mail: araujojred@terra.com.br

Received June 12, 2017
Accepted after revision September 14, 2017

Study conducted at the Clínica de Diagnóstico Por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.