Radiologia Brasileira - Publicação Científica Oficial do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia

Dear Editor,

A 43-year-old female patient with no known diseases sought medical attention complaining of increased abdominal volume. The patient underwent ultrasound and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis (Figure 1), which showed an expansile cystic lesion, with heterogeneous content, measuring 16.0 × 16.0 × 10.0 cm and containing numerous oval formations of various sizes. The lesion was hyperechoic on ultrasound and mobile upon a change in patient position. The oval formations showed intermediate signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans, with no evidence of signal loss in fat-saturated sequences or signal drop on an out-of-phase T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence. These imaging findings, although uncommon, are pathognomonic of mature cystic teratoma (MCT). The patient underwent surgery, and the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen.




Also known as a dermoid cyst, MCT is the most common benign ovarian tumor, accounting for 10—25% of cases in adult patients and 50% of those in pediatric patients^(1-3). MCTs are typically asymptomatic and slow-growing^(1,3). They are usually seen in women of reproductive age and are rarely diagnosed before puberty. Its growth ceases at menopause^(4-7). An MCT typically contains well-differentiated tissues of the three germ layers^(1,5): the ectoderm, (derived from the skin and neural tissues); the mesoderm (osteomuscular and adipose tissues); and the endoderm (ciliated and mucinous epithelium). The diversity of tissues in teratomas results in a wide variety of characteristics in imaging studies.

In most cases, pelvic tumors do not present imaging features that are considered diagnostic^(8-12). However, MCTs often present typical imaging features, which facilitate the diagnosis. Among such features, one of the most common is that of a fatty tumor⁽³⁾. In such cases, the most common ultrasound finding is that of a cystic mass with an echogenic tubercle (a Rokitansky nodule), presenting posterior acoustic shadowing secondary to calcifications, strands of hair, or foci of fat^(3,5,7).

Characteristic findings on computed tomography include areas of fat attenuation, with or without foci of calcification. On MRI, the fat seen within the lesion produces a hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images and signal loss in fat-saturated sequences^(3,5,7). In rare cases, the presentation of MCT is atypical, which can be a diagnostic challenge for radiologists^(2,6). Multiple small floating spheres within a large cyst, as observed in the case presented here, is one of those rare presentations, known as the “floating ball” presentation^(4,6). Histologically, the spheres are composed of keratin, fibrin, hemosiderin, sebaceous debris, hair, and fat, in variable proportions^(2,6,13). Although the mechanism of formation of these spheres has yet to be clarified, it is speculated that it involves aggregation of sebaceous material around a nidus^(2,4,14). The mobility of the spheres is due to their low density relative to the other content of the cyst^(2,4,6). A finding of multiple floating spheres within a single large cyst has not been reported for other types of tumors and is therefore considered pathognomonic of MCT^{(2,4,6,14-16)}.


REFERENCES

1. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. Atypical CT and MRI manifestations of mature ovarian cystic teratomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:743–50.

2. Tandon A, Agarwal R, Tandon R, et al. Multiple intracystic floating balls: an unusual but unique sonographic pattern of mature cystic teratoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr0320113962.

3. Park SB, Kim JK, Kim KR, et al. Imaging findings of complications and unusual manifestations of ovarian teratomas. Radiographics. 2008;28:969–83.

4. Gürel H, Gürel SA. Ovarian cystic teratoma with a pathognomonic appearance of multiple floating balls: a case report and investigation of common characteristics of the cases in the literature. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2008.e17–9.

5. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics. 2001;21:475–90.

6. Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Khunamornpong S, et al. Numerous intracystic floating balls as a sonographic feature of benign cystic teratoma: report of 5 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1587–91.

7. Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS, et al. Review of ovarian tumors in children and adolescents: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2014;34:2039–55.

8. Salvadori PS, Bomfim LN, von Atzingen AC, et al. Spontaneous rupture of ovarian cystadenocarcinoma: pre- and post-rupture computed tomography evaluation. Radiol Bras. 2015:330–2.

9. Lima LLA, Parente RCM, Maestá I, et al. Clinical and radiological correlations in patients with gestational trophoblastic disease. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:241–50.

10. Guerra LFA, Pessanha LB, Oliveira GA, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia: sonographic, radiological and histopathological findings. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:62–3.

11. Queiroz RM, Costa PP, Oliveira NYF, et al. Female urethral diverticulum containing a urothelial carcinoma. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:406–7.

12. Manikkavasakar S, Ramachandram A, Ramalho M, et al. Malignant uterine disease with concurrent miometrial contraction at MRI: a possible source of overstaging. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:342–3.

13. Donnadieu AC, Deffieux X, Le Ray C, et al. Unusual fast-growing ovarian cystic teratoma during pregnancy presenting with intracystic fat “floating balls” appearance. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1758–9.

14. Altinbas SK, Yalvac S, Kandemir O, et al. An unusual growth of ovarian cystic teratoma with multiple floating balls during pregnancy: a case report. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38:325–7.

15. Rao JR, Shah Z, Patwardhan V, et al. Ovarian cystic teratoma: determined phenotypic response of keratocytes and uncommon intracystic floating balls appearance on sonography and computed tomography. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:687–91.

16. Kawamoto S, Sato K, Matsumoto H, et al. Multiple mobile spherules in mature cystic teratoma of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1455–7.










1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2. Centro Estadual de Diagnóstico por Imagem do Rio de Janeiro (CEDI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Mailing address:
Dra. Ana Paula Barroso Pazinatto Espindola
Rua Vinícius de Moraes, 71, Ipanema
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 22411-010
E-mail: apazinatto@yahoo.com.br