Radiologia Brasileira - Publicação Científica Oficial do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia

AMB - Associação Médica Brasileira CNA - Comissão Nacional de Acreditação
Idioma/Language: Português Inglês

Vol. 48 nº 4 - July / Aug.  of 2015

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Print 

Page(s) 263 to 264

Teratoma: a set of teeth in the pelvis

Autho(rs): Thiago Krieger Bento da Silva1; Guilherme Jaquet Ribeiro1; Felipe Alba Scortegagna1; Gláucia Zanetti2; Edson Marchiori2

PDF English     

Texto em Português English Text

Dear Editor,

A 25-year-old woman with neither history of trauma nor other previous medical history reported a 2-month history of low back pain. Physical examination revealed no significant abnormality. Conventional abdominal radiography showed the presence of a large, heterogeneous, calcified 10-cm mass in her left lower pelvis (Figures 1A and 1B). Pelvic ultrasonography (US) revealed a large heterogeneous mass containing internal hyperechoic areas with acoustic dirty shadowing in the left adnexal area, extending to the rectouterine pouch.


Figure 1. Frontal (A) and lateral (B) radiographic image of the pelvis showing a large calcified mass with multiple toothlike calcifications, indicative of a typical mature teratoma. Photo of the gross specimen (C) showing a well-circumscribed, encapsulated mass measuring 10.3 × 9.2 × 8.6 cm. The mass was filled with a yellowish viscous material, hair, and several tooth fragments.



The patient underwent pelvic surgery with left adnexectomy. Macroscopically, the lesion measured 10.3 × 9.2 × 8.6 cm and was filled with a yellowish viscous material, hair, and several tooth fragments (Figure 1C). Analysis of histological specimens confirmed a mature teratoma containing mesodermal, endodermal, and ectodermal tissue.

A series of recent publications in the Brazilian radiological literature have evaluated the role of radiology in the study of abdominal tumors(1-8).

The term "teratoma" comprises several histological types of tumor containing mature or immature tissue of the three germ cell layers: the ectoderm (skin, brain), mesoderm (muscle, fat), and endoderm (mucinous or ciliated epithelium)(9-11). Mature teratoma is the most common benign ovarian tumor in women aged < 45 years. The clinical manifestations of ovarian teratoma range from an incidentally detected small mass to a malignantly transformed tumor associated with high mortality(10). Most mature cystic teratomas are asymptomatic. Abdominal pain or other nonspecific symptoms occur in a minority of patients(11).

At gross pathological examination, mature cystic teratomas are unilocular and frequently filled with sebaceous material and lined by squamous epithelium. Hair follicles, skin glands, muscle, and other tissues lie within the wall. A raised protuberance (Rokitansky nodule) usually projects into the cyst cavity. At any imaging modality, mature teratomas demonstrate a broad spectrum of findings ranging from purely cystic to mixed masses with components of all three germ cell layers, to noncystic masses composed predominantly of fat. Adipose tissue is present in 67-75% of cases, and teeth are seen in 31%(9-11).

Ovarian teratomas may cause various complications (e.g., torsion, rupture, malignant transformation, infection, autoimmune hemolytic anemia) with a wide spectrum of clinical and imaging features(10). At conventional radiography, a typical mature teratoma appears as a large mass with fat opacity and/or multiple toothlike calcifications(9). The most common US finding of an ovarian teratoma is a cystic mass with intratumoral fat and a densely echogenic tubercle (Rokitansky nodule) projecting into the cystic lumen(10). Most mature cystic teratomas can be diagnosed by US, but such diagnosis is complicated by their diversity in appearance(11). The diagnosis of mature cystic teratoma by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is fairly straightforward as such modalities are more fat sensitive. At CT, fat attenuation within a cyst, either with or without calcification in the wall, is diagnostic of mature cystic teratoma. Presence of fat is reported in 93% of cases and teeth or other calcifications in 56%. At MRI, the signal intensity of the sebaceous component of a teratoma is similar to that of retroperitoneal fat. Some hemorrhagic lesions may mimic this MRI appearance(11).


REFERENCES

1. Galvão BVT, Torres LR, Cardia PP, et al. Prevalence of simple liver cysts and hemangiomas in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients submitted to magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Bras. 2013;46:203-8.

2. Teixeira ACV, Torres US, Westin CEG, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the preoperative diagnosis of intestinal complications caused by clinically unsuspected ingested dietary foreign bodies: a case series emphasizing the use of volume rendering techniques. Radiol Bras. 2013;46:346-50.

3. Tyng CJ, Bitencourt AGV, Almeida MFA, et al. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of pancreatic masses using pneumodissection. Radiol Bras. 2013;46:139-42.

4. Elias Jr J. Imaging findings of unusual hepatic tumors: expanding the differential diagnosis. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(5):ix-x.

5. Silva EJC, Silva GAP. Local behavior and lymph node metastases of Wilms' tumor: accuracy of computed tomography. Radiol Bras. 2014;47:9-13.

6. Torres LR, Timbó LS, Ribeiro CMF, et al. Multifocal and metastatic hepatic hemangioendothelioma: case report and literature review. Radiol Bras. 2014;47:194-6.

7. Pedrassa BC, Rocha EL, Kierszenbaum ML, et al. Uncommon hepatic tumors: iconographic essay - Part 1. Radiol Bras. 2014;47:310-6.

8. Pedrassa BC, Rocha EL, Kierszenbaum ML, et al. Uncommon hepatic tumors: iconographic essay - Part 2. Radiol Bras. 2014;47:374-9.

9. Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, et al. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002;22:1305-25

10. Park SB, Kim JK, Kim KR, et al. Imaging findings of complications and unusual manifestations of ovarian teratomas. Radiographics. 2008;28:969-83.

11. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics. 2001;21:47590.










1. Department of Radiology, Hospital São Lucas - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Mailing Address:
Dr. Edson Marchiori
Rua Thomaz Cameron, 438, Valparaíso
Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil, 25685-120
E-mail: edmarchiori@gmail.com
 
RB RB RB
GN1© Copyright 2024 - All rights reserved to Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
Av. Paulista, 37 - 7° andar - Conj. 71 - CEP 01311-902 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil - Phone: (11) 3372-4544 - Fax: (11) 3372-4554